Seriously, that is an interesting point of view. While I'm inclined to agree -- with the theory in my head that Napoleon is more of a hedonist, and if he already trusts IK as much as he trusts anyone, and certainly more than he trusts the women he sleeps with, he might go for it if IK wants it -- I'm not sure I couldn't buy it the other way, with IK willing to give what NS wants because of their attachment ... hm ... I admit I can't predicate it on a "straight" IK or NS, because if I'm thinking with my slash cap on, they're both at least amenable to teh gay. :) That scenario -- wholly straight NS or IK with interested other -- isn't one I've ever explored, probably because if I did it would result in terrible disappointment or brokenheartedness. :)
no subject
Seriously, that is an interesting point of view. While I'm inclined to agree -- with the theory in my head that Napoleon is more of a hedonist, and if he already trusts IK as much as he trusts anyone, and certainly more than he trusts the women he sleeps with, he might go for it if IK wants it -- I'm not sure I couldn't buy it the other way, with IK willing to give what NS wants because of their attachment ... hm ... I admit I can't predicate it on a "straight" IK or NS, because if I'm thinking with my slash cap on, they're both at least amenable to teh gay. :) That scenario -- wholly straight NS or IK with interested other -- isn't one I've ever explored, probably because if I did it would result in terrible disappointment or brokenheartedness. :)